Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVillelabeitia-Jaureguizar, Koldobika
dc.contributor.authorVicente Campos, Davinia 
dc.contributor.authorBerenguel Senen, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorHernández Jiménez, Verónica
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Bautista, Lorena
dc.contributor.authorBarrios Garrido-Lestache, María Elvira
dc.contributor.authorLópez Chicharro, José
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-11T10:08:10Z
dc.date.available2018-07-11T10:08:10Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1898-018Xspa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10641/1475
dc.description.abstractBackground: Mechanical efficiency (ME) refers to the ability of an individual to transfer energy consumed by external work. A decreased ME, could represent an increased energy cost during exercise and may, therefore, be limited in terms of physical activity. This study aimed to compare the influence of two different exercise protocols: moderate continuous training (MCT) versus high intensity interval training (HIIT), as part of a cardiac rehabilitation program on ME values among coronary patients. Methods: 110 coronary patients were assigned to either HIIT or MCT groups for 8 weeks. Incremental exercise tests in a cycle ergometer were performed to obtain VO2peak. Net energy expenditure (EE) and ME were obtained at intensities corresponding to the first (VT1) and second (VT2) ventilatory thresholds, and at VO2peak. Results: Both exercise programs significantly increase VO2peak with a higher increase in the HIIT group (2.96 ± 2.33 mL/kg/min vs. 3.88 ± 2.40 mL/kg/min, for patients of the MCT and HIIT groups respectively, p < 0.001). The ME at VO2peak and VT2 only significantly increased in the HIIT group. At VT1, ME significantly increased in both groups, with a greater increase in the HIIT group (2.20 ± 6.25% vs. 5.52 ± 5.53%, for patients of the MCT and HIIT groups respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The application of HIIT to patients with chronic ischemic heart disease of low risk resulted in a greater improvement in VO2peak and in ME at VT1, than when MCT was applied. Moreover, only the application of HIIT brought about a significant increase in ME at VT2 and at VO2peak.spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherCardiology Joournalspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectCoronary artery diseasespa
dc.subjectCardiopulmonary exercise testspa
dc.subjectHigh interval trainingspa
dc.subjectMechanical efficiencyspa
dc.subjectEnergy expenditurespa
dc.titleMechanical efficiency of high versus moderate intensity aerobic exercise in coronary heart disease patients: a randomized clinical trial.spa
dc.typearticlespa
dc.description.versionpre-printspa
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessspa
dc.description.extent778 KBspa
dc.identifier.doi10.5603/CJ.a2018.0052spa


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
DAVINIA Mechanical efficiency ...777.5KbPDFView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España