Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLópez Gómez, Irene
dc.contributor.authorLuaces, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorChaves Vélez, Covadonga 
dc.contributor.authorHervas, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorDeRubeis, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorVázquez, Carmelo
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-05T11:48:24Z
dc.date.available2019-09-05T11:48:24Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0163-8343spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10641/1671
dc.description.abstractIdentifying differences in the clinical response to specific interventions is an important challenge in the field of Clinical Psychology. This is especially true in the treatment of depression where many treatments appear to have comparable outcomes. In a controlled trial, we compared a positive psychology group intervention, the Integrative Positive Psychological Intervention for Depression (IPPI-D; n = 62) to a cognitive-behavioral therapy group intervention (CBT; n = 66) for depression. No statistically or clinically-significant differences between the treatments were found, but a slight advantage was observed, on average, for IPPI-D. The aim of the present study was to identify and combine moderators of the differential efficacy of these two psychological interventions for clinical depression. For this purpose, a secondary analysis using the Personalized Advantage Index (PAI) was performed to identify the intervention predicted to produce the better outcome for each patient. Six of the 21 potential moderators were found to predict differential efficacy between the treatments. IPPI-D was predicted to be the optimal treatment for 73% of the sample. Baseline features that characterized these individuals were: mental and physical comorbidity, prior antidepressant medication, higher levels of negative thoughts, and higher personal growth. The 27% who were predicted to achieve better outcomes in CBT than in IPPI-D tended to have these baseline features: no comorbidities, no prior antidepressant medication, lower levels of negative thoughts, and lower personal growth.spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherGeneral Hospital Psychiatryspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectPersonalized Advantage Indexspa
dc.subjectPositive psychologyspa
dc.subjectPsychotherapyspa
dc.subjectCognitive-behavioral therapyspa
dc.subjectDepressionspa
dc.subjectPositive psychotherapyspa
dc.titlePredicting optimal interventions for clinical depression: moderators of outcomes in a positive psychological intervention vs. cognitive-behavioral therapy.spa
dc.typearticlespa
dc.description.versionpre-printspa
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessspa
dc.description.extent398 KBspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2019.07.004spa


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
PAI manuscrito sin comments.pdf397.0KbPDFView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España