Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorVillelabeitia Jaureguizar, Koldobika 
dc.contributor.authorVicente Campos, Davinia 
dc.contributor.authorBerenguel Senen, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorHernández Jiménez, Verónica
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Bautista, Lorena
dc.contributor.authorBarrios Garrido-Lestache, María Elvira
dc.contributor.authorLópez Chicharro, José
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-17T14:55:36Z
dc.date.available2020-06-17T14:55:36Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1897–5593spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10641/1940
dc.description.abstractBackground: Mechanical efficiency (ME) refers to the ability of an individual to transfer energy consumed by external work. A decreased ME, could represent an increased energy cost during exercise and may, therefore, be limited in terms of physical activity. This study aimed to compare the influence of two different exercise protocols: moderate continuous training (MCT) versus high intensity interval training (HIIT), as part of a cardiac rehabilitation program on ME values among coronary patients. Methods: One hundred and ten coronary patients were assigned to either HIIT or MCT groups for 8 weeks. Incremental exercise tests in a cycle ergometer were performed to obtain VO2peak. Net energy expenditure (EE) and ME were obtained at intensities corresponding to the first (VT1) and second (VT2) ventilatory thresholds, and at VO2peak. Results: Both exercise programs significantly increase VO2peak with a higher increase in the HIIT group (2.96 ± 2.33 mL/kg/min vs. 3.88 ± 2.40 mL/kg/min, for patients of the MCT and HIIT groups, respectively, p < 0.001). The ME at VO2peak and VT2 only significantly increased in the HIIT group. At VT1, ME significantly increased in both groups, with a greater increase in the HIIT group (2.20 ± ± 6.25% vs. 5.52 ± 5.53%, for patients of the MCT and HIIT groups, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The application of HIIT to patients with chronic ischemic heart disease of low risk resulted in a greater improvement in VO2peak and in ME at VT1, than when MCT was applied. Moreover, only the application of HIIT brought about a significant increase in ME at VT2 and at VO2peak. (Cardiol J 2019; 26, 2: 130–137)spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherCardiology Journalspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectCoronary artery diseasespa
dc.subjectCardiopulmonary exercise testspa
dc.subjectHigh interval trainingspa
dc.subjectMechanical efficiencyspa
dc.subjectEnergy expenditurespa
dc.titleMechanical efficiency of high versus moderate intensity aerobic exercise in coronary heart disease patients: A randomized clinical trial.spa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dc.type.hasVersionAMspa
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.description.extent251 KBspa
dc.identifier.doi10.5603/CJ.a2018.0052spa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://journals.viamedica.pl/cardiology_journal/article/view/56900spa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
56900-151194-2-PB.pdf250.9KbPDFVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España