Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorLópez Samanés, Álvaro 
dc.contributor.authorDel Coso, Juan
dc.contributor.authorHernández Davó, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Pérez, Diego
dc.contributor.authorRomero Rodríguez, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMadruga Parera, Marc
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Moreno, Alejandro 
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Pérez, Víctor
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-29T09:25:07Z
dc.date.available2021-01-29T09:25:07Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0860-021Xspa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10641/2200
dc.description.abstractTo date, there is a lack of information about the optimal conditions of the warm-up to lead to a better performance in elite tennis players. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different warm-up protocols (dynamic vs. self-myofascial release with foam rolling) on neuromuscular variables associated with physical determinants of tennis performance. Using a crossover randomised experimental design, eleven professional men tennis players (20.6 ± 3.5 years) performed either a dynamic warm-up (DWU) or a selfmyofascial release with foam rolling (SMFR) protocol. DWU consisted of 8 min of dynamic exercises at increasing intensity and SMFR consisted of 8 min of rolling on each lower extremity unilaterally. Just before (baseline) and after completing warm-up protocols, players performed a countermovement jump (CMJ), the 5-0-5 agility test, a 10-m sprint test and the Straight Leg Raise and Thomas tests to assess range of motion. Compared to baseline, the DWU was more effective to reduce the time in the 5-0-5 test than SMFR (-2.23 vs. 0.44%, respectively, p = 0.042, ηp2 = 0.19). However, both warm-up protocols similarly affected CMJ (2.32 vs. 0.61%, p = 0.373, ηp2 = 0.04) and 10-m sprint time changes (-1.26 vs. 1.03%, p = 0.124, ηp2 = 0.11). Changes in range of motion tests were also similar with both protocols (p = 0.448–1.000, ηp2 = 0.00–0.02). Overall, both DWU and SMFR were effective to prepare well-trained tennis players for highly demanding neuromuscular actions. However, DWU offered a better preparation for performing change of direction and sprint actions, and hence, in high-performance tennis players, the warm-up should include dynamic exercises.spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherBiology of Sportspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectPost-activation potentiationspa
dc.subjectDynamic stretchingspa
dc.subjectVertical jumpspa
dc.subjectSprintspa
dc.subjectRange of motionspa
dc.subjectRacket sportsspa
dc.titleAcute effects of dynamic versus foam rolling warm-up strategies on physical performance in elite tennis players.spa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dc.type.hasVersionAMspa
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.description.extent402 KBspa
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/biolsport.2021.101604spa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.termedia.pl/Acute-effects-of-dynamic-versus-foam-rolling-warm-up-strategies-on-physical-performance-in-elite-tennis-players,78,42643,0,1.htmlspa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
2.- Acute effects of dynamic ...401.7KbPDFVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España