Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAntequera, A.
dc.contributor.authorStallings, E.
dc.contributor.authorR. S., Henry
dc.contributor.authorLópez Alcalde, Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorRunnels, V.
dc.contributor.authorTudiver, S.
dc.contributor.authorTugwell, P.
dc.contributor.authorWelch, V.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-13T13:37:53Z
dc.date.available2022-01-13T13:37:53Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0895-4356spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10641/2664
dc.description.abstractObjectives To revise a sex and gender appraisal tool for systematic reviews (SGAT-SR) and apply it to Cochrane sepsis reviews. Study design and setting The revision process was informed by existing literature on sex, gender, intersectionality, and feedback from an expert advisory board. We revised the items to consider additional factors associated with health inequities and appraised sex and gender considerations using the SGAT-SR-2 and female Participation-to-Prevalence Ratio (PPR) in Cochrane sepsis reviews. Results SGAT-SR-2 consists of 19 questions appraising the review's sections and use of the terms sex and gender. amongst 71 SRs assessed, 50.7% included at least one tool item, the most frequent being the number of participants by sex or gender at included study-level (24/71 reviews). Only four reviews provided disaggregated data for the full set of included trials, while two considered other equity-related factors. Reviews rarely appraised possible similarities and differences across sex and gender. In half of a subset of reviews, female participants were under-represented relative to their share of the sepsis population (PPR<0.8). Conclusion The SGAT-SR-2 tool and the PPR can support the design and appraisal of systematic reviews to assess sex and gender considerations, address to whom evidence applies, and determine future research needs.spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherJournal of Clinical Epidemiologyspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectEquityspa
dc.subjectSex- and gender-based analysisspa
dc.subjectSystematic reviewsspa
dc.subjectSepsisspa
dc.subjectParticipation-to-Prevalence Ratiospa
dc.titleSex and Gender Appraisal Tool-Systematic Reviews-2 and Participation-To-Prevalence Ratio assessed to whom the evidence applies in sepsis reviewsspa
dc.typearticlespa
dc.description.versionpre-printspa
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessspa
dc.description.extent309 KBspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.006spa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0895435621003589?via%3Dihubspa


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
1.- Sex and Gender Appraisal ...308.2KbPDFView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España