Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Socarrás, Moises Elias
dc.contributor.authorCuadros Rivera, Vanesa
dc.contributor.authorReinoso Elbers, Javier
dc.contributor.authorLlanes González, Luis
dc.contributor.authorMichel Mercado, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorGomez Rivas, Juan
dc.contributor.authorFernandez Del Alamo, Julio
dc.contributor.authorJuarez Del Dago, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorGomez Sancha, Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-05T11:53:36Z
dc.date.available2024-01-05T11:53:36Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0022-5347spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10641/3651
dc.description.abstractPurpose: We assessed the prostate cancer detection accuracy of transperineal prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy and micro-ultrasound during the same procedure. Micro-ultrasound is a new high-resolution imaging system that allows real-time targeted biopsy. Materials and Methods: A total of 194 consecutive patients underwent transperineal prostate biopsies using real-time targeted micro-ultrasound (ExactVu™) and ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (BiopSee®) in the same procedure, from February 2018 to September 2019. Biopsies were performed using a transperineal needle guide attached to the 29 MHz high-resolution micro-ultrasound transducer. Results: The overall positive rate was 56% (108) for prostate cancer and 42% (81) for clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason Grade Group greater than 1), and adding micro-ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging detected significantly more clinically significant prostate cancer than systematic biopsy (p <0.001). Micro-ultrasound found 12 of 108 (11%) prostate cancers that were missed by all other techniques and 11 (92%) were clinically significant prostate cancer. PI-RADS® and PRI-MUS™ (Prostate Risk Identification Using Micro-Ultrasound) were strong predictors of clinically significant prostate cancer in a logistic regression model (AUC 0.76). For prostate specific antigen greater than 4 ng/ml, PI-RADS greater than 3, there was an improvement in detection rate between PRI-MUS 4 and PRI-MUS 5 (52% Gleason Grade Group greater than 1 to 92% Gleason Grade Group greater than 1). No fever or clinical infection was observed and 17 (8.7%) patients presented with minor complications (Clavien Dindo I). Conclusions: This is the first study using a transperineal approach for micro-ultrasound guided biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy. The results show a high accuracy for prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis, without infectious complications. The proposed method should be validated in large randomized clinical trials.spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherThe Journal of Urologyspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.titleProstate Mapping for Cancer Diagnosis: The Madrid Protocol. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion and Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsies.spa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dc.type.hasVersionAMspa
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.description.extent2,39 MBspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/JU.0000000000001083spa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.auajournals.org/doi/epdf/10.1097/JU.0000000000001083spa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
JU-20-217 (1) Proofs (2222).pdf1.089MbPDFVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España