Efficacy and safety outcomes of recanalization procedures in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Repositorio Dspace/Manakin

Efficacy and safety outcomes of recanalization procedures in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Título: Efficacy and safety outcomes of recanalization procedures in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Autor: Jiménez, D.; Martín Saborido, Carlos; Muriel, A.; Zamora, J.; Morillo, R.; Barrios, D.; Klok, F. A.; Huisman, M. V.; Tapson, V.; Yusen, R. D.
Resumen: Background We aimed to review the efficacy and safety of recanalisation procedures for the treatment of PE. Methods We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Science and CINAHL databases from inception through 31 July 2015 and included randomised clinical trials that compared the effect of a recanalisation procedure versus each other or anticoagulant therapy in patients diagnosed with PE. We used network meta-analysis and multivariate randomeffects meta-regression to estimate pooled differences between each intervention and meta-regression to assess the association between trial characteristics and the reported effects of recanalisation procedures versus anticoagulation. Results For all-cause mortality, there were no significant differences in event rates between any of the recanalisation procedures and anticoagulant treatment (full-dose thrombolysis: OR 0.60; 95% CI0.36 to 1.01; low-dose thrombolysis: 0.47; 95%CI 0.14 to 1.59; and catheter-associated thrombolysis: 0.31; 95%CI 0.01 to 7.96). Full-dose thrombolysis increased the risk of major bleeding (2.00; 95%CI 1.06 to 3.78) compared with anticoagulation. Catheter-directed thrombolysis was associated with the lowest probability of dying (surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), 0.67), followed by low-dose thrombolysis (SUCRA, 0.66) and full-dose thrombolysis (SUCRA, 0.55). Similarly, low-dose thrombolysis was associated with the lowest probability of major bleeding (SUCRA, 0.61), followed by catheterdirected thrombolysis (SUCRA, 0.54) and full-dose thrombolysis (SUCRA, 0.17). The results were similar in sensitivity analyses based on restricting only to studies in haemodynamically stable patients with PE. Conclusions In the treatment of PE, recanalisation procedures do not seem to offer a clear advantage compared with standard anticoagulation. Low-dose thrombolysis was associated with the lowest probability of dying and bleeding
Identificador universal: http://hdl.handle.net/10641/1363
Fecha: 2017


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver
Clean copy R1.pdf 548.2Kb PDF Ver/Abrir

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe comoAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta

Estadísticas

Enlaces