Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJiménez, D.
dc.contributor.authorMartín Saborido, Carlos 
dc.contributor.authorMuriel, A.
dc.contributor.authorZamora, J.
dc.contributor.authorMorillo, R.
dc.contributor.authorBarrios, D.
dc.contributor.authorKlok, F. A.
dc.contributor.authorHuisman, M. V.
dc.contributor.authorTapson, V.
dc.contributor.authorYusen, R. D.
dc.description.abstractBackground We aimed to review the efficacy and safety of recanalisation procedures for the treatment of PE. Methods We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Science and CINAHL databases from inception through 31 July 2015 and included randomised clinical trials that compared the effect of a recanalisation procedure versus each other or anticoagulant therapy in patients diagnosed with PE. We used network meta-analysis and multivariate randomeffects meta-regression to estimate pooled differences between each intervention and meta-regression to assess the association between trial characteristics and the reported effects of recanalisation procedures versus anticoagulation. Results For all-cause mortality, there were no significant differences in event rates between any of the recanalisation procedures and anticoagulant treatment (full-dose thrombolysis: OR 0.60; 95% CI0.36 to 1.01; low-dose thrombolysis: 0.47; 95%CI 0.14 to 1.59; and catheter-associated thrombolysis: 0.31; 95%CI 0.01 to 7.96). Full-dose thrombolysis increased the risk of major bleeding (2.00; 95%CI 1.06 to 3.78) compared with anticoagulation. Catheter-directed thrombolysis was associated with the lowest probability of dying (surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), 0.67), followed by low-dose thrombolysis (SUCRA, 0.66) and full-dose thrombolysis (SUCRA, 0.55). Similarly, low-dose thrombolysis was associated with the lowest probability of major bleeding (SUCRA, 0.61), followed by catheterdirected thrombolysis (SUCRA, 0.54) and full-dose thrombolysis (SUCRA, 0.17). The results were similar in sensitivity analyses based on restricting only to studies in haemodynamically stable patients with PE. Conclusions In the treatment of PE, recanalisation procedures do not seem to offer a clear advantage compared with standard anticoagulation. Low-dose thrombolysis was associated with the lowest probability of dying and bleedingeng
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.subjectPulmonary embolismspa
dc.subjectSystematic reviewspa
dc.titleEfficacy and safety outcomes of recanalization procedures in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis.eng
dc.typejournal articlespa
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.description.extent549 KBspa

Files in this item

Clean copy R1.pdf548.2KbPDFView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España