Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGaliana, Laura
dc.contributor.authorOliver, Amparo
dc.contributor.authorDe Simone, Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorLinzitto, Juan P.
dc.contributor.authorBenito, Enric
dc.contributor.authorSansó, Noemí
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-06T10:03:51Z
dc.date.available2020-10-06T10:03:51Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0885-3924spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10641/1989
dc.description.abstractContext. The coping with death competence is of great importance for palliative care professionals, who face daily exposure to death. It can keep them from suffering compassion fatigue and burnout, thus enhancing the quality of the care provided. Despite its relevance, there are only two measures of professionals’ ability to cope with death. Specifically, the Coping with Death Scale (CDS) has repeatedly shown psychometric problems with some of its items. Objective. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a short version of the CDS. Methods. Nine items from the original CDS were chosen for the short version. Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted in Spanish (N ¼ 385) and Argentinian (N ¼ 273) palliative care professionals. The CDS and the Professional Quality of Life Scale were used in this study. Statistical analyses included two confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs), followed by a standard measurement invariance routine. Reliability estimates and evidence of validity based on relations with other measures were also gathered. Results. CFA models had excellent fit in both the Spanish (c2(27) ¼ 107.043, P < 0.001; Comparative Fit Index [CFI] ¼ 0.978; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] ¼ 0.970; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA] ¼ 0.093 [0.075, 0.112]; Standardized Root Mean Square Residual ¼ 0.030) and Argentinian (c2(27) ¼ 102.982, P < 0.001; CFI ¼ 0.963; TLI ¼ 0.950; RMSEA ¼ 0.106 [0.085, 0.128]) samples. A standard measurement invariance routine was carried out. The most parsimonious model (c2(117) ¼ 191.738, P < 0.001; CFI ¼ 0.987; TLI ¼ 0.992; RMSEA ¼ 0.046 [0.034, 0.058]; Standardized Root Mean Square Residual ¼ 0.043) offered evidence of invariance across countries, with no latent mean differences. Evidence of reliability and evidence of validity based on relations with other measures were also appropriate. Conclusion. Results indicated the psychometric boundaries of the short version of the CDS.spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherJournal of Pain and Symptom Managementspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectCoping with deathspa
dc.subjectPalliative care professionalsspa
dc.subjectValidityspa
dc.subjectInvariance measurementspa
dc.subjectReliabilityspa
dc.subjectSpainspa
dc.subjectArgentinaspa
dc.titleA Brief Measure for the Assessment of Competence in Coping With Death: The Coping With Death Scale Short Version.spa
dc.typearticlespa
dc.description.versionpost-printspa
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessspa
dc.description.extent172 KBspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.11.003spa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.jpsmjournal.com/article/S0885-3924(18)31064-9/fulltextspa


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
PIIS0885392418310649.pdf172.9KbPDFView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España