Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarugán-Rubio, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorLópez Chicharro, José
dc.contributor.authorBecerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorLosa-Iglesias, Marta Elena
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Sanz, David
dc.contributor.authorVicente Campos, Davinia 
dc.contributor.authorMolina-Hernández, Nerea
dc.contributor.authorCalvo Lobo, César
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-25T10:19:38Z
dc.date.available2022-10-25T10:19:38Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10641/3128
dc.description.abstractDiaphragmatic weakness and thickness reduction have been detected in athletes with lumbopelvic pain (LPP). Strength training of inspiratory muscles may be necessary for athletes with LPP. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) and visual biofeedback by rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) have been proposed as possible interventions. Here, we determine the effectiveness of visual biofeedback by RUSI with a proposed novel thoracic orthotic device to facilitate diaphragmatic contraction in conjunction with high-intensity IMT in athletes with non-specific LPP. A single-blinded, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial was performed (NCT04097873). Of 86 participants assessed for eligibility, 64 athletes with non-specific LPP (39 males and 25 females; mean age, 33.15 ± 7.79 years) were recruited, randomized, analyzed and received diaphragm visual biofeedback by RUSI in conjunction with high-intensity IMT (RUSI+IMT; n = 32) or isolated high-intensity IMT (IMT; n = 32) interventions for 8 weeks. Diaphragmatic thickness during normal breathing, maximum respiratory pressures, pain intensity, pressure pain threshold on lumbar musculature, disability by the Roland–Morris questionnaire, quality of life by the SF-12 questionnaire and spirometry respiratory parameters were assessed at baseline and after the 8-week intervention. There were significant differences (p = 0.015), within a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.62) for the forced expiratory volume in 1-s (FEV1), which was increased in the RUSI+IMT intervention group relative to the IMT alone group. Adverse effects were not observed. The rest of the outcomes did not show significant differences (p > 0.05). Diaphragm visual biofeedback by RUSI with the proposed novel thoracic orthotic device in conjunction with high-intensity IMT improved lung function by increasing FEV1 in athletes with non-specific LPPspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherJournal of Clinical Medicinespa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectBiofeedbackspa
dc.subjectBreathing exercisesspa
dc.subjectDiaphragmspa
dc.subjectLow back painspa
dc.subjectUltrasonographyspa
dc.titleEffectiveness of Ultrasonography Visual Biofeedback of the Diaphragm in Conjunction with Inspiratory Muscle Training on Muscle Thickness, Respiratory Pressures, Pain, Disability, Quality of Life and Pulmonary Function in Athletes with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.spa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dc.type.hasVersionAMspa
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.description.extent1577 KBspa
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm11154318spa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/15/4318spa


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
1.- Effectiveness of Ultrasono ...1.539MbPDFView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España