dc.contributor.author | López Alcalde, Jesús | |
dc.contributor.author | Yakoub, Ninib | |
dc.contributor.author | Wolf, Markus | |
dc.contributor.author | Munder, Thomas | |
dc.contributor.author | Von Elm, Erik | |
dc.contributor.author | Flückiger, Christoph | |
dc.contributor.author | Steinert, Christiane | |
dc.contributor.author | Liebherz, Sarah | |
dc.contributor.author | Rosendahl, Jenny | |
dc.contributor.author | Witt, Claudia M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Barth, Jürgen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-16T12:36:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-16T12:36:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0895-4356 | spa |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10641/3160 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: Intervention integrity is the degree to which the study intervention is delivered as intended. This article presents the RIPI-f
checklist (Reporting Integrity of Psychological Interventions delivered face-to-face) and summarizes its development methods. RIPI-f
proposes guidance for reporting intervention integrity in evaluative studies of face-to-face psychological interventions.
Study Design and Setting: We followed established procedures for developing reporting guidelines. We examined 56 documents
(reporting guidelines, bias tools, and methodological guidance) for relevant aspects of face-to-face psychological intervention integrity. Eighty
four items were identified and grouped as per the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) domains. Twenty nine experts
from psychology and medicine and other scholars rated the relevance of each item in a single-round Delphi survey.Amultidisciplinary panel of
11 experts discussed the survey results in three online consensus meetings and drafted the final version of the checklist.
Results: We propose RIPI-f, a checklist with 50 items. Our checklist enhances TIDieR with important extensions, such as therapeutic
alliance, provider’s allegiance, and the adherence of providers and participants.
Conclusion: RIPI-f can improve the reporting of face-to-face psychological interventions. The tool can help authors, researchers,
systematic reviewers, and guideline developers. We suggest using RIPI-f alongside other reporting guidelines. | spa |
dc.language.iso | eng | spa |
dc.publisher | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | spa |
dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject | Face-to-face psychological intervention | spa |
dc.subject | Non-pharmacological intervention | spa |
dc.subject | Fidelity | spa |
dc.subject | Adherence | spa |
dc.subject | Delphi survey | spa |
dc.subject | Reporting guideline | spa |
dc.title | The RIPI-f (Reporting Integrity of Psychological Interventions delivered face-to-face) checklist was developed to guide reporting of treatment integrity in face-to-face psychological interventions. | spa |
dc.type | journal article | spa |
dc.type.hasVersion | AM | spa |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | spa |
dc.description.extent | 504 KB | spa |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.013 | spa |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089543562200186X?via%3Dihub | spa |