Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBuffet García, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorPlaza-Manzano, Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorVarol, Umut
dc.contributor.authorRíos-León, Marta
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Arribas, María José
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez González, Javier
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Jorge, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorValera-Calero, Juan Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-15T11:42:26Z
dc.date.available2024-03-15T11:42:26Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2306-5354spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10641/4239
dc.description.abstractExtended field-of-view ultrasound (US) imaging, also known as panoramic US, represents a technical advance that allows for complete visualization of large musculoskeletal structures, which are often limited in conventional 2D US images. Currently, there is no evidence examining whether the experience of examiners influences muscle shape deformations that may arise during the glide of the transducer in panoramic US acquisition. As no studies using panoramic US have analyzed whether two examiners with differing levels of experience might obtain varying scores in size, shape, or brightness during the US assessment of the rectus femoris muscle, our aim was to analyze the inter-examiner reliability of panoramic US imaging acquisition in determining muscle size, shape, and brightness between two examiners. Additionally, we sought to investigate whether the examiners’ experience plays a significant role in muscle deformations during imaging acquisition by assessing score differences. Shape (circularity, aspect ratio, and roundness), size (cross-sectional area and perimeter), and brightness (mean echo intensity) were analyzed in 39 volunteers. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurements (SEM), minimal detectable changes (MDC), and coefficient of absolute errors (CAE%) were calculated. All parameters evaluated showed no significant differences between the two examiners (p > 0.05). Panoramic US proved to be reliable, regardless of examiner experience, as no deformations were observed. Further research is needed to corroborate the validity of panoramic US by comparing this method with gold standard techniques.spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherBioengineeringspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectPanoramic ultrasoundspa
dc.subjectDiagnostic accuracyspa
dc.subjectUltrasound imagingspa
dc.subjectQuadricepsspa
dc.titleReliability of Panoramic Ultrasound in Assessing Rectus Femoris Size, Shape, and Brightness: An Inter-Examiner Study.spa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dc.type.hasVersionVoRspa
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.description.extent1094 KBspa
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/bioengineering11010082spa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/11/1/82spa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
bioengineering-11-00082-v2.pdf1.067MbPDFVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España