Acute effects of dynamic versus foam rolling warm-up strategies on physical performance in elite tennis players.
dc.contributor.author | López Samanés, Álvaro | |
dc.contributor.author | Del Coso, Juan | |
dc.contributor.author | Hernández Davó, José Luis | |
dc.contributor.author | Moreno Pérez, Diego | |
dc.contributor.author | Romero Rodríguez, Daniel | |
dc.contributor.author | Madruga Parera, Marc | |
dc.contributor.author | Muñoz Moreno, Alejandro | |
dc.contributor.author | Moreno Pérez, Víctor | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-29T09:25:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-29T09:25:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.description.abstract | To date, there is a lack of information about the optimal conditions of the warm-up to lead to a better performance in elite tennis players. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different warm-up protocols (dynamic vs. self-myofascial release with foam rolling) on neuromuscular variables associated with physical determinants of tennis performance. Using a crossover randomised experimental design, eleven professional men tennis players (20.6 ± 3.5 years) performed either a dynamic warm-up (DWU) or a selfmyofascial release with foam rolling (SMFR) protocol. DWU consisted of 8 min of dynamic exercises at increasing intensity and SMFR consisted of 8 min of rolling on each lower extremity unilaterally. Just before (baseline) and after completing warm-up protocols, players performed a countermovement jump (CMJ), the 5-0-5 agility test, a 10-m sprint test and the Straight Leg Raise and Thomas tests to assess range of motion. Compared to baseline, the DWU was more effective to reduce the time in the 5-0-5 test than SMFR (-2.23 vs. 0.44%, respectively, p = 0.042, ηp2 = 0.19). However, both warm-up protocols similarly affected CMJ (2.32 vs. 0.61%, p = 0.373, ηp2 = 0.04) and 10-m sprint time changes (-1.26 vs. 1.03%, p = 0.124, ηp2 = 0.11). Changes in range of motion tests were also similar with both protocols (p = 0.448–1.000, ηp2 = 0.00–0.02). Overall, both DWU and SMFR were effective to prepare well-trained tennis players for highly demanding neuromuscular actions. However, DWU offered a better preparation for performing change of direction and sprint actions, and hence, in high-performance tennis players, the warm-up should include dynamic exercises. | spa |
dc.description.extent | 402 KB | spa |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5114/biolsport.2021.101604 | spa |
dc.identifier.issn | 0860-021X | spa |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10641/2200 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | spa |
dc.publisher | Biology of Sport | spa |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.termedia.pl/Acute-effects-of-dynamic-versus-foam-rolling-warm-up-strategies-on-physical-performance-in-elite-tennis-players,78,42643,0,1.html | spa |
dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España | * |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | spa |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject | Post-activation potentiation | spa |
dc.subject | Dynamic stretching | spa |
dc.subject | Vertical jump | spa |
dc.subject | Sprint | spa |
dc.subject | Range of motion | spa |
dc.subject | Racket sports | spa |
dc.title | Acute effects of dynamic versus foam rolling warm-up strategies on physical performance in elite tennis players. | spa |
dc.type | journal article | spa |
dc.type.hasVersion | AM | spa |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 6c91a821-6154-4a36-b305-d1f26211285c | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | d741b174-6a67-4857-a659-3d660adce645 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 6c91a821-6154-4a36-b305-d1f26211285c |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- 2.- Acute effects of dynamic versus foam rolling.pdf
- Size:
- 401.75 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: