Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorFernandez Felix, Borja M.
dc.contributor.authorVarela Barca, Laura
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Esquinas, Esther
dc.contributor.authorCorrea Pérez, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorFernández Hidalgo, Nuria
dc.contributor.authorMuriel, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorLópez Alcalde, Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez Diaz, Noelia
dc.contributor.authorPijoan, Jose I.
dc.contributor.authorRoque, Marta
dc.contributor.authorRibera, Aida
dc.contributor.authorNavas Elorza, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorFariñas Álvarez, Mª Carmen
dc.contributor.authorGoenaga Sánchez, Miguel Ángel
dc.contributor.authorZamora, Javier
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-11T11:16:52Z
dc.date.available2021-11-11T11:16:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1198-743Xspa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10641/2597
dc.description.abstractBackground There are several prognostic models to estimate the risk of mortality after surgery for active infective endocarditis (IE). However, these models incorporate different predictors and their performance is uncertain. Objective We systematically reviewed and critically appraised all available prediction models of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing surgery for IE, and aggregated them into a meta-model. Data sources We searched Medline and EMBASE databases from inception to June 2020. Study eligibility criteria We included studies that developed or updated a prognostic model of postoperative mortality in patient with IE. Methods We assessed the risk of bias of the models using PROBAST (Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool) and we aggregated them into an aggregate meta-model based on stacked regressions and optimized it for a nationwide registry of IE patients. The meta-model performance was assessed using bootstrap validation methods and adjusted for optimism. Results We identified 11 prognostic models for postoperative mortality. Eight models had a high risk of bias. The meta-model included weighted predictors from the remaining three models (EndoSCORE, specific ES-I and specific ES-II), which were not rated as high risk of bias and provided full model equations. Additionally, two variables (age and infectious agent) that had been modelled differently across studies, were estimated based on the nationwide registry. The performance of the meta-model was better than the original three models, with the corresponding performance measures: C-statistics 0.79 (95% CI 0.76–0.82), calibration slope 0.98 (95% CI 0.86–1.13) and calibration-in-the-large –0.05 (95% CI –0.20 to 0.11). Conclusions The meta-model outperformed published models and showed a robust predictive capacity for predicting the individualized risk of postoperative mortality in patients with IE. Protocol registration PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020192602).spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherClinical Microbiology and Infectionspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectPrognostic modelsspa
dc.subjectSystematic reviewspa
dc.subjectMeta-modelspa
dc.subjectAggregationspa
dc.subjectValidationspa
dc.subjectInfective endocarditisspa
dc.titlePrognostic models for mortality after cardiac surgery in patients with infective endocarditis: a systematic review and aggregation of prediction models.spa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dc.type.hasVersionSMURspa
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.description.extent270 KBspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.051spa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1198743X21003025?via%3Dihubspa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
2.- Prognostic models for mortality ...255.7KbPDFVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España