Home calligraphic exercises as manual dexterity training in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a pilot feasibility study.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers

Publication date

Start date of the public exhibition period

End date of the public exhibition period

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor & Francis
Metrics
Google Scholar
Share
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Purpose To assess the feasibility and effects on manual dexterity and the quality of life (QoL) of a 12-week home calligraphic training program in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods A pilot study with participants recruited from the Movement Disorders consultation at the Hospital 12 de Octubre (Madrid). The main outcome, manual dexterity, was assessed using the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT). Secondary outcomes included clinical rating scales that contemplate aspects related to manual dexterity (DextQ-24, UPDRSII, UPDRSIII), and QoL (PDQ-39 and EuroQoL-5D). Results Thirty PD patients (57% males) with a mean age of 66.11 (9.76) years and 93% adherence rate. The PPT scores improved significantly (p < 0.0001) from T0 (start of the study) to T1 (after 24 weeks). No statistically significant change was found in DextQ-24, UPDRS-II and UPDRS-III, but a clear improvement was observed in the QoL measurement: EuroQoL-5D (p < 0.0001), PDQ-39 (p < 0.0001) and modified PDQ-39 (p = 0.022). Conclusions This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility and improvement in hand dexterity assessed by the PPT for patients diagnosed with PD after a 12-week home calligraphic training program. A significant improvement was noted in the QoL measurements, such as the PDQ-39, modified PDQ-39, and EuroQoL-5D.

Doctoral program

Description

Citation

Llamas-Velasco, S., Romero Ferreiro, C., González Fuertes, Á., et al. (2023). Home calligraphic exercises as manual dexterity training in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a pilot feasibility study. Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. Núm. 5, pp. 870–874.